![]() ![]() ![]() The development and implementation of national legislation and practices with regard to protection and rights of migrants, with a view to satisfying the provisions of applicable international instruments that guarantee respect for the rights of migrants (2) Cooperation between the Parties shall be based on a specific needs-assessment conducted in mutual consultation and agreement between the Parties and be implemented in accordance with the relevant Union and national legislation in force. Migration concerns shall be included in the national strategies/national development framework for economic and social development of countries of origin, transit and destination of migrants. With a view to strengthening cooperation, the Parties shall establish a mechanism for comprehensive dialogue and consultation on all migration-related issues. ‘(1) The Parties reaffirm the importance of the joint management of migratory flows between their territories. H – Maintenance of the effects of the annulled decisionīy this action, the European Commission requests the Court of Justice to annul Council Decision 2012/272/EU of 14 May 2012 on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of a framework agreement on partnership and cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part ( 2) (‘the contested decision’), in so far as the Council of the European Union added legal bases concerning transport, the readmission of third-country nationals and the environment.Īrticle 26 of the framework agreement on partnership and cooperation between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Republic of the Philippines, of the other part (‘the PCA’), ( 3) entitled ‘Cooperation on migration and development’ and included in Title V on cooperation on migration and maritime labour, is worded as follows: G – The addition of the legal basis concerning the readmission of third-country nationalsĢ. Migration and development cooperation policyģ. Article 26 of the PCA in the light of previous practiceĤ. The current practice concerning readmission agreements ![]() IV – The order sought by the parties and the procedure before the Courtī – The relevant case-law as it stands and the determination of the applicable criterionĬ – Origins, content and general scheme of the PCAĭ – Development cooperation in EU law and the categorisation of the PCAĮ – The addition of legal bases concerning transportį – The addition of the legal basis on the environment ‛Action for annulment - Decision 2012/272/EU - Development cooperation - Transport - Environment - Readmission of nationals of third countries - Legal basis under Title V of the FEU Treaty’ Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 23 January 2014.Įuropean Commission v Council of the European Union.Īction for annulment - Council Decision 2012/272/EU on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and the Republic of the Philippines - Choice of legal basis - Articles 79 TFEU, 91 TFEU, 100 TFEU, 191 TFEU and 209 TFEU - Readmission of third-country nationals - Transport - Environment - Development cooperation.ĭigital reports (Court Reports - general) Opinion of Advocate General Mengozzi delivered on 23 January 2014.#European Commission v Council of the European Union.#Action for annulment - Council Decision 2012/272/EU on the signing, on behalf of the Union, of the Framework Agreement on Partnership and Cooperation between the European Union and the Republic of the Philippines - Choice of legal basis - Articles 79 TFEU, 91 TFEU, 100 TFEU, 191 TFEU and 209 TFEU - Readmission of third-country nationals - Transport - Environment - Development cooperation.#Case C‑377/12. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |